Os meios alternativos de solução de controvérsias e o desenvolvimento da justiça restaurativa no poder judiciário brasileiro.

Abstract

The article aims to analyze the application of restorative justice in the Brazilian Judiciary, focusing on alternative dispute resolution methods and the principle of collaboration. The objective is to understand how restorative practices can change the procedural logic as we know it, in order to produce consensual solutions and strengthen social pacification. To this end, a theoretical-analytical research was carried out, based on classical and contemporary authors, as well as a normative analysis of CNJ Resolution No. 225/2016 and related public policies. The results indicate that the adoption of collaborative methods, such as mediation and conciliation, leads to an increase in the effectiveness of judicial services, reduces residual litigation, and contributes to building a dialogical and ethical environment. It is concluded that restorative justice is not limited to an alternative method but represents a real possibility of a paradigmatic shift, capable of redefining the role of judges and parties, in order to promote human dignity and a culture of peace.